Satoshi Nakamototo Martti Malmi <mmalmi@cc.hut.fi> · · original
Any idea what's going on with it? Every time I look, it's fine.
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:55:06AM +0100, Satoshi Nakamoto wrote:
> bitcoin.sourceforge.net looks fine now. Maybe sourceforge was doing
Doesn't work right now.
> some maintenance.
Liberty Standard wrote:
In case you weren't aware, the Bitcoin website is down.
http://bitcoin.sourceforge.net/
-----
You are running bitweaver in TEST mode
* Click here to log a bug, if this appears to be an error with the
application.
* Go here to begin the installation process, if you haven't done so
already.
* To hide this message, please set the IS_LIVE constant to TRUE
in your
kernel/config_inc.php file.
mmalmi@cc.hut.fito Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> · · original
IS_LIVE option was indeed set to false, but it only affects the
visibility of error messages to user. I've noticed the site being slow
at times, sometimes taking up to 30 seconds to load. I think it's
related to the Sourceforge hosting. Bitweaver should be among the
lightest PHP CMS'es, but I can check out if there are any issues to it.
Off the topic, do you think that we could use Boost's thread and
socket libraries instead of the Windows-specific ones? Are there other
windows-only-functions used in the code?
Any idea what's going on with it? Every time I look, it's fine.
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:55:06AM +0100, Satoshi Nakamoto wrote:
> > bitcoin.sourceforge.net looks fine now. Maybe sourceforge was doing
Doesn't work right now.
> > some maintenance.
Liberty Standard wrote:
> In case you weren't aware, the Bitcoin website is down.
>
> http://bitcoin.sourceforge.net/
>
> -----
> You are running bitweaver in TEST mode
>
> * Click here to log a bug, if this appears to be an error with the
> application.
> * Go here to begin the installation process, if you haven't done so
> already.
> * To hide this message, please set the IS_LIVE constant to TRUE in your
> kernel/config_inc.php file.
Sourceforge is just so darn slow. I don't know what else to do though.
It's such a standard, more often than not any given project has a
projectname.sourceforge.net site. When I see whatever.sourceforge.net
in a google search, I assume that's the official site.
Is there a way to make Bitweaver allow users to edit (and maybe delete)
their own messages in the forum?
Getting antsy to port to Linux? It's not a decision to be taken lightly
because once it's done, it doubles my testing and building workload.
Although I am worried about Liberty's Wine crashes.
I've tried to be as portable as possible and use standard C stuff
instead of Windows calls. The threading is _beginthread which is part
of the standard C library. wxWidgets has wxCriticalSection stuff we can
use. The sockets code is send/recv stuff which I think is the same as
unix because Microsoft ported sockets from BSD. We need direct control
over sockets, it wouldn't be a good idea to get behind an abstraction
layer. wxWidgets is a good place to look for cross-platform support
functions. I want to avoid #ifdefing up the code if we can. Anything
that's used more than once probably becomes a function in util.cpp that
has the #ifdef in it.
BTW, I have a lot of uncommitted changes right now because it includes
some crucial protocol transitions that can't be unleashed on the network
until I've tested the heck out of it. It shouldn't be too much longer.
Can you make the setup uninstall the Startup folder icon? I figure it
should install and uninstall an icon in a regular program group, and
just uninstall the Startup folder one. I guess it doesn't matter that
much whether it installs and uninstalls the Startup folder icon or just
uninstalls it.
mmalmi@cc.hut.fi wrote:
IS_LIVE option was indeed set to false, but it only affects the
visibility of error messages to user. I've noticed the site being slow
at times, sometimes taking up to 30 seconds to load. I think it's
related to the Sourceforge hosting. Bitweaver should be among the
lightest PHP CMS'es, but I can check out if there are any issues to it.
Off the topic, do you think that we could use Boost's thread and socket
libraries instead of the Windows-specific ones? Are there other
windows-only-functions used in the code?
> Any idea what's going on with it? Every time I look, it's fine.
>
>
> Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:55:06AM +0100, Satoshi Nakamoto wrote:
>> > bitcoin.sourceforge.net looks fine now. Maybe sourceforge was doing
>
> Doesn't work right now.
>
>> > some maintenance.
>
>
> Liberty Standard wrote:
>> In case you weren't aware, the Bitcoin website is down.
>>
>> http://bitcoin.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> -----
>> You are running bitweaver in TEST mode
>>
>> * Click here to log a bug, if this appears to be an error with the
>> application.
>> * Go here to begin the installation process, if you haven't done so
>> already.
>> * To hide this message, please set the IS_LIVE constant to TRUE
>> in your
>> kernel/config_inc.php file.
mmalmi@cc.hut.fito Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> · · original
Sourceforge is just so darn slow. I don't know what else to do though.
It's such a standard, more often than not any given project has a
projectname.sourceforge.net site. When I see whatever.sourceforge.net
in a google search, I assume that's the official site.
Is there a way to make Bitweaver allow users to edit (and maybe delete)
their own messages in the forum?
It's not possible with the current version of Bitweaver. Bitweaver's
wiki and forum packages aren't so very highly advanced. SF hosting
also has its disadvantages, like the occasional slowness and lack of
e-mailer and user IP retrieving. I've been considering to buy web
hosting from prq.se (the host of Wikileaks and Pirate Bay, among
others) to be used later for the exchange service. I could maybe host
the project site there as well, under a separate user account for
better security. There I could set up Drupal or TikiWiki, which are
more advanced and have quite a lot bigger and more active
developer/user communities than Bitweaver.
Getting antsy to port to Linux? It's not a decision to be taken
lightly because once it's done, it doubles my testing and building
workload. Although I am worried about Liberty's Wine crashes.
I've tried to be as portable as possible and use standard C stuff
instead of Windows calls. The threading is _beginthread which is part
of the standard C library. wxWidgets has wxCriticalSection stuff we
can use. The sockets code is send/recv stuff which I think is the same
as unix because Microsoft ported sockets from BSD. We need direct
control over sockets, it wouldn't be a good idea to get behind an
abstraction layer. wxWidgets is a good place to look for
cross-platform support functions. I want to avoid #ifdefing up the
code if we can. Anything that's used more than once probably becomes a
function in util.cpp that has the #ifdef in it.
Ok. I replaced the Windows thread and socket library includes with
their POSIX equivalents, and now it only gives a few errors, mostly svn/branches, it doesn't need to be an official release yet.
Can you make the setup uninstall the Startup folder icon? I figure it
should install and uninstall an icon in a regular program group, and
just uninstall the Startup folder one. I guess it doesn't matter that
much whether it installs and uninstalls the Startup folder icon or just
uninstalls it.
I'll convert the CriticalSection code to wxCriticalSection and upload it
to SVN (it's a little tricky). I don't know what to do for
TryEnterCriticalSection though. I think I'm almost ready to check
everything in.
You're probably right, it's about time to do a linux build. I've been
working on getting my linux machine set up and building the dependencies.
Ok. I replaced the Windows thread and socket library includes with their
POSIX equivalents, and now it only gives a few errors, mostly from the
CriticalSections. If I make it work, I'll put it into svn/branches, it
doesn't need to be an official release yet.
mmalmi@cc.hut.fito Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> · · original
I'll convert the CriticalSection code to wxCriticalSection and upload
it to SVN (it's a little tricky). I don't know what to do for
TryEnterCriticalSection though. I think I'm almost ready to check
everything in.
